And Another Thing... Output is not impact
I once said four words to a member of my team that I still think about. “I don’t care about that.”
We were talking about a task that mattered a great deal to the Senate office. It needed to be done, and done well. But it wasn’t my responsibility as the Senator, and I didn’t personally need to know how to do it. That’s what I had hired a capable team for. So when the details started coming my way, I said what was in my head, as plainly as it came out.
What I meant was this: this work is important to the office, and it doesn’t rise to the level of me knowing how to perform every step. That’s why you’re here, and I trust you with it.
What I said was something else entirely.
Later that week, the subject came up in a meeting, and my team member said, “Never mind, I know you don’t care.” That’s when I heard what my words had done. I had sent four words. My team member received a whole message: your work doesn’t matter to me.
I told that story earlier this week, and I’m bringing it here because it holds a lesson most organizations are still learning the hard way.
Most of us measure communication by output. Emails sent. Meetings held. Updates posted. The slide deck shared with the whole department. By that measure, I communicated just fine that day. I responded. I was direct. I was efficient. And I was wrong, because communication isn’t measured at the sender’s end. It’s measured at the receiver’s.
Organizations multiply this at scale. The town hall with forty slides. The policy memo everyone acknowledges and almost no one absorbs. The manager who sends more updates than anyone on the floor and still leads a team that can’t tell you what matters this week. Volume feels like leadership because it’s the easiest thing to count. But the only communication that shapes what people do next is the communication that actually reaches them.
Output is what you sent. Impact is what they believed when you were done.
That difference has a price. What doesn’t reach people turns into rework, missed handoffs, and decisions made on a guess. And there’s a quieter cost that never shows up in a project report. The person who stops bringing things to you. My team member didn’t file a complaint. They simply stopped expecting me to care. That’s how preventable turnover begins, long before anyone writes a resignation letter, and Gallup estimates that replacing an employee costs 50 to 200 percent of that person’s annual salary.
You can see the same pattern in how we talk about emerging professionals. NACE research has found a gap of nearly 30 percentage points between how employers rate new hires on professionalism and how those new hires rate themselves. I don’t read that as a failing on either side. Part of that gap is what happens when a standard gets sent in onboarding binders and orientation slides, but never truly received. Professional character™ is built in the moments when the expectation reaches the person, in plain language, with the why attached.
The leaders who close that gap don’t necessarily talk more. They check what took root. They say why something matters, not just what needs to happen. They listen for their own shorthand, the phrases they reach for when they’re busy, because that’s usually where the wrong message hides. And when someone’s response doesn’t match what they meant, they go back and say it again, better, instead of assuming the other person missed it.
I haven’t said “I don’t care about that” since, unless that’s exactly what I mean. That one moment taught me more about leadership than any meeting I ever ran on time.
So here’s one thing to do this week. Choose one message you send often, a recurring update, a quick reply, a phrase you use when you’re stretched thin, and ask one person on your team what they hear when you say it. Then listen to the answer without defending the words.
If your team repeated back what they believe you care about, would it match what you meant?
If you’d like And Another Thing... in your inbox every Thursday, subscribe so the next one finds you.
The base that elevates everything.
Angelia Williams Graves is the founder of Plinth Advisors, a Norfolk, Virginia-based employee and leadership retention advisory firm. Through speaking, consulting, and cohort coaching, Plinth Advisors helps organizations in government, business, and higher education keep their strongest people and prepare them to lead, treating professional character as an economic asset, not a soft skill. Angelia also serves in the Virginia State Senate and hosts the Earned Equity podcast. Learn more at plinthadvisors.com.
Comments